Zed: A fast collaborative editor with AI features and an open source core.
Zed is a high-performance code editor from the team behind Atom and Tree-sitter. It is not only an AI coding tool, but its AI features make it relevant for developers who care about speed, collaboration, and a modern editing surface. Zed stands out because the editor itself is open source and built around low-latency collaboration, while AI is layered into an editor that already has strong technical taste. It is a better fit for developers who want a fast editor with AI than for teams looking for a fully autonomous coding agent.
Quick facts
- Pricing
- Free editor with optional paid AI and collaboration services.
- Free tier
- Yes
- Supported languages
- Rust, JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go, Many LSP-backed languages
- Platform
- macOS, Linux, Windows preview
- Open source
- Yes
- Models used
- Claude, OpenAI-compatible models, Bring-your-own API options
Zed review
Zed is a high-performance code editor from the team behind Atom and Tree-sitter. It is not only an AI coding tool, but its AI features make it relevant for developers who care about speed, collaboration, and a modern editing surface. Zed stands out because the editor itself is open source and built around low-latency collaboration, while AI is layered into an editor that already has strong technical taste. It is a better fit for developers who want a fast editor with AI than for teams looking for a fully autonomous coding agent.
In practice, Zed is most useful when the team picks a narrow workflow and measures whether the tool improves that job. For developers who value editor performance, open source-minded teams, pair programming, the important question is not whether the demo looks impressive. It is whether the generated code fits your repository, whether the tool makes its changes easy to inspect, and whether a developer can recover quickly when the model misunderstands the task.
Pricing also matters because AI coding usage can grow faster than expected. Free editor with optional paid AI and collaboration services. Check the vendor pricing page before buying because usage limits and model access can change. Teams should test realistic prompts, not only a single autocomplete, and estimate monthly cost for heavy users, occasional reviewers, and nontechnical collaborators separately.
The strongest reason to choose Zed is fit. It supports macOS, Linux, Windows preview and is commonly used with Rust, JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go. That makes it a credible option for developers who value editor performance, open source-minded teams, pair programming. The weaker fit is no-code app generation, teams wanting mature vs code extension parity, fully autonomous coding tasks, where a different category of AI coding tool may be more effective.
Best for
- - Developers who value editor performance
- - Open source-minded teams
- - Pair programming
Not great for
- - No-code app generation
- - Teams wanting mature VS Code extension parity
- - Fully autonomous coding tasks
Pros
- - Very fast editor
- - Open source core
- - Strong collaboration vision
- - Modern language tooling
Cons
- - AI is not as central as Cursor
- - Extension library is younger
- - Some platform support is newer
- - Less suitable for non-coders
Pricing breakdown
Free editor with optional paid AI and collaboration services. Confirm current limits and usage terms on the official pricing page before adopting it across a team.
| Dimension | Zed | Continue |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free editor with optional paid AI and collaboration services. | Open source with bring-your-own model costs and enterprise options. |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Platforms | macOS, Linux, Windows preview | VS Code, JetBrains |
| Languages | Rust, JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go, Many LSP-backed languages | JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go, Java, Rust |
| Models | Claude, OpenAI-compatible models, Bring-your-own API options | OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, Ollama, Local models, Custom providers |
| Best for | Developers who value editor performance, Open source-minded teams, Pair programming | Teams needing model control, Developers staying in VS Code or JetBrains, Open source AI workflows |
Related tools
Open source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains.
Continue is an open source coding assistant that plugs into existing editors rather than asking developers to switch environments. Its main draw is control: teams can choose models...
Review ContinueAn AI-first code editor for agentic edits across real projects.
Cursor is the best-known AI-native editor for developers who want chat, autocomplete, repo-aware edits, and increasingly agentic workflows inside a VS Code-like environment. Its st...
Review CursorAn AI coding environment from Codeium focused on multi-file flow.
Windsurf is Codeium's AI coding editor for developers who want an integrated editor experience with autocomplete, chat, and agent-like changes. It is often compared directly with C...
Review WindsurfGoogle agent-first IDE for managing autonomous coding workstreams.
Google Antigravity is an agent-first development environment that pushes beyond autocomplete and chat into agent orchestration. The product combines a familiar editor surface with ...
Review Google AntigravityOpen source AI pair programming from the terminal.
Aider is an open source command-line coding assistant that edits files in a local Git repository and works with multiple model providers. It has a loyal following because it is sim...
Review Aider